.

Mount Will Vote Against the First Selectman's Budget

Town councilwoman claims the proposal has missing information and a lack of transparency

To the Editor:

Why as a council member, I am voting NO tomorrow night on this budget. This meeting is open to the public.

The budget presented to the Town Council was mired in obfuscations, missing information and a lack of transparency. The town presented many questions which the first selectman could not answer.

A quick overview – shows spending up by 7%, Business revenue down by 4.5% (Since the economic development director position was cut last year Monroe lost 168 businesses and gained 140) and a proposed new bonding that would add 8 million dollars to our bond obligation over the next two years.

This budget includes a purportedly “streamlined” consolidated Planning and Building Group that includes Building, Inland Wetlands, Planning and Zoning, a new “Engineering department."

It actually creates 2.5 new jobs, and includes an increase of more than 615% increase in consulting fees. Also salaries are increased in some areas by over 15%. The Planning and Zoning Department spending increased by 16.71%, Inland Wetlands by 64.94% and “Engineering Department by 100% because it is new.

This not a streamlining it is an expansion. This new organization includes $26,500, in new consulting fees. The proposed new jobs and salaries were not accompanied by job descriptions and the Town Council was not provided new Job descriptions on which to approve new salaries.

This reorganization was not done according to charter rules. It is the town council’s purview to approve, new non-appointed positions, the corresponding salaries and new department. I will vote no to all of the above.

The first selectman’s budgets again draws down our undesignated fund even further by $370,000, which jeopardizes our bond rating, and leaving less than half of the recommended $7-7 1/5 million that is recommended. I will vote that any money we cut go into the undesignated fund balance for the future health of Monroe.

Again there is no one year or five year capital plan by the First Selectman. The First Selectman wants to bond close to $5 million in new bonds, $1 million of which will go to roads increasing its debt service over $100,000.00 or 127%. The new proposed bonding will also increase our current bond obligation from $60,650,672 to $68,338,072 in 2013.

I am not in favor of bonding for roads and suggest we add money for roads into the operating budget and not incur greater debt service that will be our future generation’s responsibility.

There are other areas which can be decreased such as Police Department overtime; it increased overtime while having added two officers. We talk about sacrifice, yet the budget includes $60,000 for Wolfe Park improvements, that’s $60,000 we could use for roads.

There are increases to non-essential departments while cutting money for the Assessor to conduct a business audit which the Tax Collector stated would yield $10 dollars for every $1 spent. If the true goal was to increase the tax base and
reduce everyone’s overall tax burden, cutting $15,000.00 which would produce $1 to $2 million, is not the way to do it.

This budget increases spending, drives up debt service, doesn’t fund revenue generating activity and lacks a capital plan making it incomplete. It greatly increases the planning and building function of the town by over a couple of hundred thousand dollars while it purports to streamline the process.

We need a forward thinking budget that makes the hard choices now to make a better and more affordable Monroe later.

Michele Mount,

Town Council

Mitchell March 02, 2011 at 01:00 AM
I was wondering how long it was going to take for your intelligence to chime in. I thought maybe you got lost in a funnel of Norwalk IEP or IPe's whatever they call them.
Bridgeport March 02, 2011 at 02:37 AM
How would it be offset? You're trying to tell me that 3 projects of equal size leading to $700,000 a year in revenue would hurt the town? I propose smart economic growth, which, if actually smart, will not affect quality of life. I don't understand how Monroe can justify allowing a McDonalds that won't pay nearly as much in taxes, vs. another entity like Swiss Army. I think Swiss Army and it's annual tax revenue is much smarter and leads to a higher quality of life than a McDonalds dont you? I understand taxes rise in Connecticut, but this is Monroe. Our budget is OUR issue, not the state's. If you don't believe in the expansion of smart commercial growth, then what do you suggest we do? Services, Salaries, etc. all continue to go up and cost, and those get passed directly down to the taxpayer, with more money genereated through commercial enterprises wouldn't that lift the burden? I don't believe 2 children would cost the town 18-24K? How did you come up with those figures? 24k a year on a child? I know it doesn't cost anything close to that to educate a child, am I wrong? Also who's to say the number of children living directly on that golf course. You also can't forget that Whitney Farms pays $140,000 in taxes and it's municpal owned. If you were to allow private golf club into the area, and it wanted to buy a nice chunk of land, you better believe taxes generated would be way more that 140,000.
QWERTY March 02, 2011 at 03:42 AM
Then why isn't the role called "Special Education Supervisor"? To me, the titles implies this positions offers broad support services to ALL students of Monroe. And the town is paying $137K for someone to "supervise" the education of a small minority of Monroe's student population? No wonder this town is such debt...
Margaret Monroe March 03, 2011 at 08:01 PM
Yes
Margaret Monroe March 03, 2011 at 08:06 PM
There are so many false statements in this letter that I am surprised the editor even allowed it to be posted. The budget has not even been voted upon by the Town Council yet, so any portion of it can still be amended. I encourage all interested citizens attend the Town Council workshop and meeting tonight (2/28) at 6:30p to hear the truth for themselves. Hey J.P. - what are you going to do? Report the Editor to his supervisor as you are so good at doing? And, by the way, why don't you tell all of us why YOU missed more than 1/2 of the budget workshop sessions? I think the taxpayers whom you are suppose to be representing have a right to know!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »