.
Feedback

Election Day: The Calm After the Storm

Voter turnout was lower by noon than it was for municipal elections in 2009 and 2007. Officials believe last weekend's snowstorm and massive power outages led to increased apathy.

Two power company trucks made their way up Fan Hill Road before turning onto Knorr Road late Tuesday morning and a worker directed traffic for a tree crew on Cutlers Farm Road in the afternoon. Monroe's municipal election is being held under a clear blue sky on a warm, spring-like November day, but remnants of last weekend's snowstorm and townwide power outages still linger.

Outside a polling place at Fawn Hollow Elementary School, candidates and supporters held up signs and greeted voters, who trickled in several minutes apart.

Karen Burnaska, head moderator at the polls, believes the aftermath of the storm is behind the low voter turnout.

"I think they are coming off a very difficult week," said Burnaska, the former first selectman. "We have people coming here who still don't have cable."

Most homeowners and some businesses were left without electricity, water and phone service for a week or longer. As of Tuesday morning, Connecticut Light & Power's outage map showed 12 Monroe customers still waiting to get their power back.

As of noon, 1,458 people voted, accounting for 11.4 percent of the total electorate, according to Burnaska, who added at the same time two years ago turnout was 15.6 percent and that 13.6 percent had voted by noon in 2007.

"I think it's the storm," said Susan Koneff, Democratic Registrar of Voters.

"I think so too," Jeannette Benson, the Republican Registrar, agreed.

Koneff said, "I think people are too busy getting their lives back to normal. Hopefully they'll come later in the day — and that could possibly happen."

She also wondered whether people who missed a significant amount of work hours from the storm aftermath may not have been able to get to the polls before work Tuesday morning.

"We can only guess," Koneff said of the low turnout.

According to the Registrars Office, Monroe has 12,833 registered voters, including 6,962 unaffiliated, 3,284 Republicans, 2,553 Democrats and 34 classified as "other."

First Selectman Candidates in Good Spirits

First Selectman Steve Vavrek greeted voters in the Fawn Hollow Elementary School parking lot. He believes there is "a little apathy" from the storm and said some people told him they were upset over a negative tone during the campaign.

"Some people told me they voted for me because they're tired of the negativity out there," Vavrek said. "And some believe the hype."

Despite talk of negativity, the first selectman expressed a positive outlook on Election Day. "We are moving the town forward and I'm fairly confident with the responses I've gotten that people see that," he said. "But I am not resting on my laurels. Heck no. I'm here 24/7. I'm happy with the town. I feel we're moving in the right direction."

His challenger, Democrat, Phyllis Kansky also had high hopes.

"I'm feeling very up actually. I'm feeling good," she said, while standing outside the polls at Masuk High School. "I feel very confident that I will take this. I've worked hard and the Democratic Town Committee worked hard. I look forward to a victory tonight."

This election season has seemed quiet, but Kansky said the reason for her optimism stems from a phone campaign, which included 1,000 calls to the third district alone. Most of the people who answered their phone were open minded and positive, according to Kansky.

What about many of the calls made her feel confident?

"People said that they'll vote for me," Kansky said with a smile.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monroe Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:23 pm
If you have any trouble, email support@patch.com. The help desk will do it for you if need be. ButRead More changing your settings should work.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Hi Steve, To stop getting emails for every comment under a story, when you're signed on, click underRead More "Hi Steve" at the top of the page, and choose Email Settings from the dropdown menu. There's an option titled "Comments", uncheck the box that is automatically checked so you will no longer receive comment updates by email.
Steve Kirsch May 15, 2013 at 11:56 am
I found that I could turn them off in my profile under e-mail settings. However, it appears thatRead More this is now an all or nothing rather than by selected posts or individual articles.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
Hi Steve, The comment stream doesn't appear on the homepage in the new design. Some of the sitesRead More that went 2.0 before mine did heard complaints about that. I don't know if it will be changed or not. Right now Patch is gathering all feedback.
Crown Royal May 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Perhaps a unique ID sent out yearly with you tax bill or something like that? Or I think what mightRead More be better is rather than crossing off names manually on a sheet of paper when you go to vote, they should use a computer system. This would allow you to travel to the closest polling place (Not across town as is the case with me.)
Christine E. May 3, 2013 at 03:36 am
They don't ask you for ID to fill out an absentee! No difference, IMO.
QWERTY May 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
That's why I stated, "two MAIN groups of VOTERS": 1. Parent's who always vote YES - theyRead More want as much $$$ for education as possible. 2. People who always vote NO, regardless of budget - they don't want to pay more in taxes. These groups have an obvious reason to vote. After that, it starts to get fragmented. I really haven't seen much literature from the "Parents who don't want more taxes" group.
LittleTalks April 23, 2013 at 09:10 pm
@John, never said we should freeze spending till everyone can afford it, no need to be a dramaRead More queen. And it is none of your business what I have done for others. But what I have not done, is belittle those that can't afford a tax increase and pretend I am better than them.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:23 pm
No one's expecting anything different! Monroe benefits from wealthier resident, not poorer ones!Read More That's the hard and rash truth. I'm not saying it's right or honest! It's to the town's benefit to price people out of their homes as disgusting as that may sound.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Being unemployed is also finite, that's why it's a good idea to create a 12 month householdRead More emergency fund. No one forces someone to purchase a home without this emergency fund.
Alex April 21, 2013 at 11:00 pm
I'll vote yes when its at a 3.5% mill rate increase. That's a decent tax increase in this economy.Read More It's tough working $20-$40 increases per month into your personal budget each year on top of everything else that increases in price.
Fed Up April 21, 2013 at 09:11 pm
No more tax increases. Read our lips.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The budget is a fair one, and the quality of our schools and town services depend upon it. There isRead More never a good time for a mill rate increase, but it is well worth the investment in our home values, community, and kid's education. Please vote Yes on Tuesday.
Crown Royal April 26, 2013 at 07:34 pm
David, This is already approved.
David Wilgan April 26, 2013 at 07:29 pm
My understanding is the contract for 10 years. First, I don't trust any corporation, period; letRead More alone for 10 years. What if Honeywell goes bankrupt? is this project bonded by Honeywell to insure completion? And to those how say Honeywell will never go under, need I mention Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and the plethora of banks, investment companies and auto manufacturers that required bailouts to remain afloat. Moreover, what is the savings based upon? Again, my understanding is the savings are based on the current natural gas price versus oil; and Honeywell will guarantee to offset any shortfall in savings if the price increases. Is there an aggregate maximum of shortfall payout, or is Honeywell's exposure unlimited? Also, if this is such a great deal, why is the town being charged 1.45% interest on a municipal lease? Why not zero percent; let's negotiate harder. Furthermore, why is the town borrowing the $ from CLP @ 0% interest? CLP should make the total $400,000 a direct grant for their inferior service and overpriced utility rates. I'm tired of subsidizing large dividends and massive executive payouts to screw ups. The contract can be written for 10 years, provided Honeywell bonds the project, the contract is conditionally renewable by the town each year based upon the realized savings and subject to renegotiation; CLP grants the $ up front and 0% is charged on the lease. Tell Honeywell to stick the door locks, I prefer bonding the project.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
The Honeywell contract is the absolute right thing to do. It is critical to get out on Tuesday andRead More vote yes.