.
Feedback

Jury selection to resume Monday for Komisarjevsky trial

One juror selected, 20 more to go

A new group of prospective jurors are scheduled to appear in New Haven Superior Court on Monday to start the second week of jury selection for the trial of Cheshire home invasion defendant Joshua Komisarjevsky.

One juror was chosen last week from the first group of 40, a doctor employed by the Yale School of Medicine.

Defense lawyers and prosecutors may also learn from Judge Jon C. Blue when arguments will be heard on a defense motion to sentence Komisarjevsky, 30, to life without possibility of release, sparing him from the death penalty, in return for a guilty plea. Judge Blue said another judge would hear the motion.

State’s Attorney Michael Dearington and Senior Assistant State’s Attorney Gary W. Nicholson filed a brief Friday opposing the motion. They said the state intends to seek the death penalty.

The motion, filed on March 11, quoted Komisarjevsky’s statement to police that his co-defendant, Steven Hayes, 47, strangled Cheshire mother Jennifer Hawke-Petit and started the fire that killed her two daughters, Hayley, 17, and Michaela, 11, in 2007.

Hayes was found guilty in a separate trial in 2010 and was sentence to be executed. He is now on death row.

During his trial, he blamed Komisarjevsky for starting the fire.

Komisarjevsky is represented by attorneys Jeremiah Donovan, Todd A. Bussert and Walter Bansley.

He is charged with 17 counts including capital felony murder, kidnapping, arson, larceny, burglary, assault and sexual assault.

The charges also include the beating and kidnapping of Dr. William Petit Jr., the victims’ husband and father, who escaped to a neighbor’s house as the fire was ignited.

Jury selection for Komisarjevsky’s trial began on March 15. Three prospective jurors were excused because they knew someone participating in the trial, 18 because the lengthy trial would pose a financial hardship for them, and 16 who admitted they had formed strong opinions about the case and could not be impartial.

Three others were dismissed with peremptory challenges, two by the defense and one by the prosecution. Each side gets a total of 40 peremptory challenges, which they can use to reject a juror without having to say why.

Judge Blue said the court must select 12 jurors, six alternates and three standby alternates. He said the trial is scheduled to start on Sept. 19 and could take three months if a guilty verdict leads to a two-month penalty phase.

An article in the New Haven Register last week said the defense of the two defendants had already cost about $2.25 million. That includes their lawyers’ fees and the cost of transporting them to court with a state police escort.

The one juror selected said he heard of the case from news reports, but he had not followed the case much and had not formed an opinion.

Questioning of prospective jurors last week focused on whether they could decide the case based on the evidence and follow the judge’s instructions on the law.

The Register also reported that Komisarjevsky’s mother attended the jury selection on Thursday, sitting in the front row of the spectator’s section on the defense side of the courtroom.

Komisarjevsky came to court with a short haircut, dressed in a white shirt and tie. One published report said his appearance was so changed that State’s Attorney Dearington did not recognize him, but that was incorrect.

When Dearington asked who was seated at the defense table, defense lawyers introduced their two jury selection consultants.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monroe Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:23 pm
If you have any trouble, email support@patch.com. The help desk will do it for you if need be. ButRead More changing your settings should work.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Hi Steve, To stop getting emails for every comment under a story, when you're signed on, click underRead More "Hi Steve" at the top of the page, and choose Email Settings from the dropdown menu. There's an option titled "Comments", uncheck the box that is automatically checked so you will no longer receive comment updates by email.
Steve Kirsch May 15, 2013 at 11:56 am
I found that I could turn them off in my profile under e-mail settings. However, it appears thatRead More this is now an all or nothing rather than by selected posts or individual articles.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
Hi Steve, The comment stream doesn't appear on the homepage in the new design. Some of the sitesRead More that went 2.0 before mine did heard complaints about that. I don't know if it will be changed or not. Right now Patch is gathering all feedback.
Crown Royal May 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Perhaps a unique ID sent out yearly with you tax bill or something like that? Or I think what mightRead More be better is rather than crossing off names manually on a sheet of paper when you go to vote, they should use a computer system. This would allow you to travel to the closest polling place (Not across town as is the case with me.)
Christine E. May 3, 2013 at 03:36 am
They don't ask you for ID to fill out an absentee! No difference, IMO.
QWERTY May 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
That's why I stated, "two MAIN groups of VOTERS": 1. Parent's who always vote YES - theyRead More want as much $$$ for education as possible. 2. People who always vote NO, regardless of budget - they don't want to pay more in taxes. These groups have an obvious reason to vote. After that, it starts to get fragmented. I really haven't seen much literature from the "Parents who don't want more taxes" group.
LittleTalks April 23, 2013 at 09:10 pm
@John, never said we should freeze spending till everyone can afford it, no need to be a dramaRead More queen. And it is none of your business what I have done for others. But what I have not done, is belittle those that can't afford a tax increase and pretend I am better than them.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:23 pm
No one's expecting anything different! Monroe benefits from wealthier resident, not poorer ones!Read More That's the hard and rash truth. I'm not saying it's right or honest! It's to the town's benefit to price people out of their homes as disgusting as that may sound.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Being unemployed is also finite, that's why it's a good idea to create a 12 month householdRead More emergency fund. No one forces someone to purchase a home without this emergency fund.
Alex April 21, 2013 at 11:00 pm
I'll vote yes when its at a 3.5% mill rate increase. That's a decent tax increase in this economy.Read More It's tough working $20-$40 increases per month into your personal budget each year on top of everything else that increases in price.
Fed Up April 21, 2013 at 09:11 pm
No more tax increases. Read our lips.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The budget is a fair one, and the quality of our schools and town services depend upon it. There isRead More never a good time for a mill rate increase, but it is well worth the investment in our home values, community, and kid's education. Please vote Yes on Tuesday.
Crown Royal April 26, 2013 at 07:34 pm
David, This is already approved.
David Wilgan April 26, 2013 at 07:29 pm
My understanding is the contract for 10 years. First, I don't trust any corporation, period; letRead More alone for 10 years. What if Honeywell goes bankrupt? is this project bonded by Honeywell to insure completion? And to those how say Honeywell will never go under, need I mention Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and the plethora of banks, investment companies and auto manufacturers that required bailouts to remain afloat. Moreover, what is the savings based upon? Again, my understanding is the savings are based on the current natural gas price versus oil; and Honeywell will guarantee to offset any shortfall in savings if the price increases. Is there an aggregate maximum of shortfall payout, or is Honeywell's exposure unlimited? Also, if this is such a great deal, why is the town being charged 1.45% interest on a municipal lease? Why not zero percent; let's negotiate harder. Furthermore, why is the town borrowing the $ from CLP @ 0% interest? CLP should make the total $400,000 a direct grant for their inferior service and overpriced utility rates. I'm tired of subsidizing large dividends and massive executive payouts to screw ups. The contract can be written for 10 years, provided Honeywell bonds the project, the contract is conditionally renewable by the town each year based upon the realized savings and subject to renegotiation; CLP grants the $ up front and 0% is charged on the lease. Tell Honeywell to stick the door locks, I prefer bonding the project.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
The Honeywell contract is the absolute right thing to do. It is critical to get out on Tuesday andRead More vote yes.