.
Feedback

Malloy: ‘Expect to Be Without Power for A Prolonged Period of Time'

The governor declared a state of emergency Saturday evening and warned that more than 550,000 could lose power as a result of the storm.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy held a press conference Saturday evening to announce that he had declared a state of emergency and warn Connecticut residents that they should expect to be without power “for a prolonged period of time” due to the rare October snowstorm that is currently pummeling the state.

“The storm has a number of additional hours to run its course, and obviously it has created extremely dangerous circumstances,” Malloy said at the state’s Emergency Operations Center at the State Armory in Hartford. “…Travel is obviously dangerous. We would like people to stay off the roads as much as possible.”

Malloy said that Connecticut Light & Power, the state’s largest electrical provider, was reporting approximately 419,000 customers without power, and that United Illuminating was reporting approximately 17,000 without power. He said that power outages could reach upwards of 550,000 during the storm, which is forecasted to continue through Sunday morning, and that residents without power or who may still lose it during the storm should not expect it to return quickly.

In Monroe, 87 percent of CL&P's customers were without power as of 9:11 p.m.

“If you are without power, you should expect to be without power for a prolonged period of time,” Malloy said, noting that the current number of Connecticut residents without power exceeded the total number of power outages caused by Hurricane Gloria in the 1980s.

He said that both CL&P and UI both have line crews out working during the storm, but stressed that the crews primarily function is to deal with dangerous or unsafe conditions, such as downed or live wires that could cause fires or injuries. Malloy said restoration work would not occur until the potentially dangerous conditions caused by the storm had passed.

“We are not in restoration right now. I want to be very clear,” Malloy said. “I don’t want anyone to be operating with beliefs that we’re in restoration. We’re not. We won’t be until it’s safer.”

Malloy said there was one reported fatality thus far due to the storm, a motorist along Route 85 in Colchester, and that one Connecticut State Trooper had also suffered injuries during the storm, but that they were not serious.

Malloy said he thought the state was well prepared to handle the freak October snowstorm and that there were currently 600 state vehicles out clearing roadways, and an additional 40 contracted vehicles assisting, but that many Connecticut residents might not have heeded the warnings or believed the storm would be as severe as it was. He urged residents to stay home and stay off the roads until the storm passed.

Malloy said that Bradley International Airport was still open and that 23 planes so far had been diverted there. The record for diverted planes at Bradley is 27, he said.

The state of emergency and widespread power outages come just two months after more than 800,000 state residents lost power during Tropical Storm Irene. It took more than a week for power to be restored to the entire state.

When asked, Malloy said he did not know how long restoration efforts could take this time around

“It is impossible to tell,” he said. “…There are an extremely high number of outages.”

Malloy said he planned to make representatives from both CL&P and UI available tomorrow morning to provide an update. According to CL&P's website, approximately 512,102 of the company's 1,237,830 customers, or 41 percent, were without power at approximately 8:20 p.m. Saturday. CL&P's full outage map can be viewed here

Related Topics: Connecticut Emergency, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, Nor'easter, October snowstorm, and Winter Storm Alfred

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monroe Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:23 pm
If you have any trouble, email support@patch.com. The help desk will do it for you if need be. ButRead More changing your settings should work.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Hi Steve, To stop getting emails for every comment under a story, when you're signed on, click underRead More "Hi Steve" at the top of the page, and choose Email Settings from the dropdown menu. There's an option titled "Comments", uncheck the box that is automatically checked so you will no longer receive comment updates by email.
Steve Kirsch May 15, 2013 at 11:56 am
I found that I could turn them off in my profile under e-mail settings. However, it appears thatRead More this is now an all or nothing rather than by selected posts or individual articles.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
Hi Steve, The comment stream doesn't appear on the homepage in the new design. Some of the sitesRead More that went 2.0 before mine did heard complaints about that. I don't know if it will be changed or not. Right now Patch is gathering all feedback.
Crown Royal May 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Perhaps a unique ID sent out yearly with you tax bill or something like that? Or I think what mightRead More be better is rather than crossing off names manually on a sheet of paper when you go to vote, they should use a computer system. This would allow you to travel to the closest polling place (Not across town as is the case with me.)
Christine E. May 3, 2013 at 03:36 am
They don't ask you for ID to fill out an absentee! No difference, IMO.
QWERTY May 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
That's why I stated, "two MAIN groups of VOTERS": 1. Parent's who always vote YES - theyRead More want as much $$$ for education as possible. 2. People who always vote NO, regardless of budget - they don't want to pay more in taxes. These groups have an obvious reason to vote. After that, it starts to get fragmented. I really haven't seen much literature from the "Parents who don't want more taxes" group.
LittleTalks April 23, 2013 at 09:10 pm
@John, never said we should freeze spending till everyone can afford it, no need to be a dramaRead More queen. And it is none of your business what I have done for others. But what I have not done, is belittle those that can't afford a tax increase and pretend I am better than them.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:23 pm
No one's expecting anything different! Monroe benefits from wealthier resident, not poorer ones!Read More That's the hard and rash truth. I'm not saying it's right or honest! It's to the town's benefit to price people out of their homes as disgusting as that may sound.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Being unemployed is also finite, that's why it's a good idea to create a 12 month householdRead More emergency fund. No one forces someone to purchase a home without this emergency fund.
Alex April 21, 2013 at 11:00 pm
I'll vote yes when its at a 3.5% mill rate increase. That's a decent tax increase in this economy.Read More It's tough working $20-$40 increases per month into your personal budget each year on top of everything else that increases in price.
Fed Up April 21, 2013 at 09:11 pm
No more tax increases. Read our lips.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The budget is a fair one, and the quality of our schools and town services depend upon it. There isRead More never a good time for a mill rate increase, but it is well worth the investment in our home values, community, and kid's education. Please vote Yes on Tuesday.
Crown Royal April 26, 2013 at 07:34 pm
David, This is already approved.
David Wilgan April 26, 2013 at 07:29 pm
My understanding is the contract for 10 years. First, I don't trust any corporation, period; letRead More alone for 10 years. What if Honeywell goes bankrupt? is this project bonded by Honeywell to insure completion? And to those how say Honeywell will never go under, need I mention Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and the plethora of banks, investment companies and auto manufacturers that required bailouts to remain afloat. Moreover, what is the savings based upon? Again, my understanding is the savings are based on the current natural gas price versus oil; and Honeywell will guarantee to offset any shortfall in savings if the price increases. Is there an aggregate maximum of shortfall payout, or is Honeywell's exposure unlimited? Also, if this is such a great deal, why is the town being charged 1.45% interest on a municipal lease? Why not zero percent; let's negotiate harder. Furthermore, why is the town borrowing the $ from CLP @ 0% interest? CLP should make the total $400,000 a direct grant for their inferior service and overpriced utility rates. I'm tired of subsidizing large dividends and massive executive payouts to screw ups. The contract can be written for 10 years, provided Honeywell bonds the project, the contract is conditionally renewable by the town each year based upon the realized savings and subject to renegotiation; CLP grants the $ up front and 0% is charged on the lease. Tell Honeywell to stick the door locks, I prefer bonding the project.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
The Honeywell contract is the absolute right thing to do. It is critical to get out on Tuesday andRead More vote yes.