Public Comment? I'll Have Seconds

The Town Council recently added a second public comment session for the end of its meetings.

Residents attending Town Council meetings sometimes want to say something after actions are taken, only to have to wait until the public comment session at the next meeting. A recent change will give them a second bite of the apple.

Town Councilman Nick Kapoor's proposal to add a second public session to the tailend of the council's meetings passed by a vote of 5-4.

"This is an idea I brought forward to the Town Council as a non-member to have a second public session," Kapoor explained at Monday night's meeting. "This keeps government more open and allows the public to weigh in on Town Council actions without waiting until the next meeting and over the summer. It's at the disgretion of the chairman."

The change to the council's rules and procedures will allow a second public session lasting no longer than 20 minutes. The chairman may choose who gets to speak and no speaker can talk longer than three minutes. Discussion is limited to what happened at the meeting. This change does not apply to special meetings.

Not all Town Council members agreed with the change.

"We do allow public discussion at our meetings," J.P. Sredzinski said. "The public can see the agenda and comment to try to influence a vote and give us more information, present cases, opinions and views. We don't set a timer. We don't bang a gavel. I think it's okay the way it is. I appreciate your idea. I think it's great to have Town Council members with new ideas, but I don't think we need a change at this time."

Kapoor said in instances of a vote haven been taken on an appointee to a board or a commission, that person should be able to comment that same night.

"It's a good way to keep people involved," Kapoor said. "It keeps us more in tuned with what people are thinking. I highly recommend approving this."

Town Councilwoman Dee Dee Martin said she saw no drawback to it and Chairwoman Enid Lipeles also said she would be supporting it.

Town Councilwoman Debra Dutches said, "I guess my concern is if we take one vote or 10 votes in an evening and everyone in the audience has an opinion on it ... It belabors what we've done if it doesn't lend to the vote or more information. I'm just concerned with it."

Sredzinski said, "Most of my interaction with constituents is outside of the Town Council Chambers, not all in meetings. It's on the street, at Dunkin Donuts, emails, phone calls — the interaction is still there. I don't think this is going to benefit the council's input any by having a second public participation."

Martin replied, "If you don't see a benefit, do you see a harm? What would be the harm in doing it?"

Kapoor said, "There's nothing like having the first selectman and all of us sitting here. When it needs to happen, it's there. It benefits the public. They can speak."

Town Councilman Tony Unger said, "My concern is if we do this, it will create a big problem. If we already made a decision and if we re-look at it again, it will create more problems. It's better [to allow public comment] before we vote, not have it after, [where people can say], 'I don't like the way you voted.' There's nothing positive."

Kapoor said, "We should be open to hearing people who disagree with us. That's when our ears should perk up more."

Unger replied that the session should be about public participation and "not for us to defend our votes."

Town Councilman Frank Lieto said, "I agree with Mr. Unger. I think the harm would be causing people to violate our guidelines against personal complaints or defamatory comments."

Voting in favor of adding the second public session were Kapoor, Martin, Ray Knapp, Lipeles and Dutches. Voting against it were Sredzinski, Lieto, Unger and Town Council Vice Chairwoman Deborah Heim.

Nick Kapoor June 15, 2012 at 07:01 PM
Monroe Taxpayer, I know that whatever I hear during a meeting whether it be during public participation, old business or new business, I do not ignore or dismiss. Polling all residents on how they feel on all important issues is why residents elect representatives for them. The only way to truly know how all residents feel about an issue is through an official referendum of the town and we have that mechanism in our charter as well as the budget referendum and of course Election Day every year. Furthermore, every Town Councilperson has a town email address that can be found here (http://monroect.org/TownCouncil.aspx), my personal email is kapoorn555@gmail.com. Also, every Town Council meeting is open to the public and has public participation (2 OF THEM!). I, personally, would love to see the Council Chambers busting at the seams with people during our meetings, but that usually doesn't happen. I wholeheartedly agree with you that the welfare of monroe should not be about who can make the most noise. There are many ways for every resident of the Town to get in touch with their elected officials and make their opinions heard through the press, to their elected officials or most importantly at public participations through the various boards and commissions.
Jethro June 15, 2012 at 07:16 PM
@ a resident - political babble? Hmmm. Seems anytime the farse selectman or the republican majority are criticized you and your merry gang of followers get hurt feelings. Are we not allowed to criticize town government because it hurts the feelings of the power players in town ? Should the news not be reported?
a resident June 15, 2012 at 07:25 PM
You are not reporting or responding to news, you are being devisive and spreading lies as a member of the democratic minority, which being the minority is a bug in your bonnet. That is why you behave so. Could you be more shallow and obvious. Poor you.
Jethro June 15, 2012 at 07:51 PM
@ a resident - commenting on town government is spreading lies? Sounds like you favor a Big Brother 1984 type of government. Only democrats are unhappy with monroe's elected officials? Really? Anyone who criticizes town government is a democrat or spreading lies? Wow.
Barney June 16, 2012 at 12:30 AM
This town council needs to stand for mr. Vavrek. He understands this here be a farming community. These liberal hippies have no right to take second questions. I bet ya those coming for second questions are education lovers. Mr. Vavrek tell me how dangerous they be. It not be normal to support hippie questions. I stand with mr. vavrek. Mr. vavrek told me there be too many interlopers here in town. Not sure what that means but i know mr. vavrek be right. Stand with me behind mr. vavrek.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »