.
Feedback

Revising Monroe's Zoning Regulations

Planning & Zoning Commissioners are starting the process of revising its regulations.

What kinds of commercial development does Monroe want to see on Main Street? Should zoning regulations encourage agriculture? What standards should be followed for accessory apartments? The Planning & Zoning Commission is reviewing the regulations that shape Monroe's Future.

Some regulations may be outdated, others too stringent or lax and new ones could be proposed.

"Some homeowners wondered if the town would entertain a bed and breakfast," David Killeen, the town planning administrator, told the commission at its meeting Thursday night. "That is something we haven't considered."

P&Z Chairman Richard Zini said a red book containing proposed revisions and everything done from 2006 to 2009 will be reviewed by commissioners.

"We don't want to lose sight of any work that was done," Zini said of past work on the regulations, adding the record contains comments made by commissioners and members of the public.

The P&Z's first workshop will most likely be held on Feb. 23. From March to early September, Zini said the commission will immerse itself in reviewing the plan. Then there will be heavy public input from September to November.

Killeen said, "Hopefully by the end of December we'll be able to adopt any revisions."

All proposed regulations and amendments must be reviewed by the town attorney, according to Zini.

A consultant will be hired in April to assist the commission by drafting the proposal for the updated regulations. Requests for proposals would go out in a process that involves the first selectman and the Board of Finance. The final candidate would be chosen by the commission. Zini said funding for consultants is already in the town operating budget and that the commission could ask for it to be re-assigned in the next budget.

Not Re-Inventing the Wheel

Killeen expressed his hope that the town will "spruce up the existing regulations, but also add some new components."

Zini told his fellow commissioners that there are a lot of issues that have not gone away, but just have not been addressed yet. "We're not trying to re-invent the wheel," he said.

One-by-one commissioners expressed any concerns or goals they had going into the process.

"It is my hope that whatever we do will be more business stimulating than something that is repressive," said Sean O'Rourk. "We need to improve our tax base."

Killeen said zoning is finding a balance between enforcing regulations and not infringing upon the rights of property owners.

P&Z Vice Chairman Patrick O'Hara wants to encourage agriculture in town "in a progressive manner allowing for it and being mindful of what neighbors expect." He conceded that he has a personal interest in the issue. O'Hara owns O'Hara's Nursery on Route 110.

O'Hara also wants to look at what kinds of commercial development would be best for Main Street.

Commissioner Cathleen Lindstrom cited a statistic from Connecticut Housing, a non-profit group, showing that about one-third of Monroe's population is age 60 and older. If new U.S. Census numbers echo that, Lindstrom noted it could mean big changes in town.

"Almost one-third of our population may be moving and younger families may be moving in," she said.

That could mean more demand for accessory apartments and greater impacts on the school system.

"These are issues that are going to hit us hard," Lindstrom said.

Zini quickly pointed out that the latest U.S. Census numbers have yet to be released, adding those are the statistics the P&Z goes by when revising town regulations.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monroe Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:23 pm
If you have any trouble, email support@patch.com. The help desk will do it for you if need be. ButRead More changing your settings should work.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Hi Steve, To stop getting emails for every comment under a story, when you're signed on, click underRead More "Hi Steve" at the top of the page, and choose Email Settings from the dropdown menu. There's an option titled "Comments", uncheck the box that is automatically checked so you will no longer receive comment updates by email.
Steve Kirsch May 15, 2013 at 11:56 am
I found that I could turn them off in my profile under e-mail settings. However, it appears thatRead More this is now an all or nothing rather than by selected posts or individual articles.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
Hi Steve, The comment stream doesn't appear on the homepage in the new design. Some of the sitesRead More that went 2.0 before mine did heard complaints about that. I don't know if it will be changed or not. Right now Patch is gathering all feedback.
Crown Royal May 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Perhaps a unique ID sent out yearly with you tax bill or something like that? Or I think what mightRead More be better is rather than crossing off names manually on a sheet of paper when you go to vote, they should use a computer system. This would allow you to travel to the closest polling place (Not across town as is the case with me.)
Christine E. May 3, 2013 at 03:36 am
They don't ask you for ID to fill out an absentee! No difference, IMO.
QWERTY May 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
That's why I stated, "two MAIN groups of VOTERS": 1. Parent's who always vote YES - theyRead More want as much $$$ for education as possible. 2. People who always vote NO, regardless of budget - they don't want to pay more in taxes. These groups have an obvious reason to vote. After that, it starts to get fragmented. I really haven't seen much literature from the "Parents who don't want more taxes" group.
LittleTalks April 23, 2013 at 09:10 pm
@John, never said we should freeze spending till everyone can afford it, no need to be a dramaRead More queen. And it is none of your business what I have done for others. But what I have not done, is belittle those that can't afford a tax increase and pretend I am better than them.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:23 pm
No one's expecting anything different! Monroe benefits from wealthier resident, not poorer ones!Read More That's the hard and rash truth. I'm not saying it's right or honest! It's to the town's benefit to price people out of their homes as disgusting as that may sound.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Being unemployed is also finite, that's why it's a good idea to create a 12 month householdRead More emergency fund. No one forces someone to purchase a home without this emergency fund.
Alex April 21, 2013 at 11:00 pm
I'll vote yes when its at a 3.5% mill rate increase. That's a decent tax increase in this economy.Read More It's tough working $20-$40 increases per month into your personal budget each year on top of everything else that increases in price.
Fed Up April 21, 2013 at 09:11 pm
No more tax increases. Read our lips.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The budget is a fair one, and the quality of our schools and town services depend upon it. There isRead More never a good time for a mill rate increase, but it is well worth the investment in our home values, community, and kid's education. Please vote Yes on Tuesday.
Crown Royal April 26, 2013 at 07:34 pm
David, This is already approved.
David Wilgan April 26, 2013 at 07:29 pm
My understanding is the contract for 10 years. First, I don't trust any corporation, period; letRead More alone for 10 years. What if Honeywell goes bankrupt? is this project bonded by Honeywell to insure completion? And to those how say Honeywell will never go under, need I mention Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and the plethora of banks, investment companies and auto manufacturers that required bailouts to remain afloat. Moreover, what is the savings based upon? Again, my understanding is the savings are based on the current natural gas price versus oil; and Honeywell will guarantee to offset any shortfall in savings if the price increases. Is there an aggregate maximum of shortfall payout, or is Honeywell's exposure unlimited? Also, if this is such a great deal, why is the town being charged 1.45% interest on a municipal lease? Why not zero percent; let's negotiate harder. Furthermore, why is the town borrowing the $ from CLP @ 0% interest? CLP should make the total $400,000 a direct grant for their inferior service and overpriced utility rates. I'm tired of subsidizing large dividends and massive executive payouts to screw ups. The contract can be written for 10 years, provided Honeywell bonds the project, the contract is conditionally renewable by the town each year based upon the realized savings and subject to renegotiation; CLP grants the $ up front and 0% is charged on the lease. Tell Honeywell to stick the door locks, I prefer bonding the project.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
The Honeywell contract is the absolute right thing to do. It is critical to get out on Tuesday andRead More vote yes.