Town Bills Neighbors for Water Main. Amount Still in Dispute

A Forest Road resident came up with a figure that's $3,155 less than the $10,735 per property the Town Council approved Monday night.

When Andriy and Valeviya Potapovs bought their home on Forest Road last year, they said no one had told them of an assessment of thousands of dollars the couple would be asked to pay for a water main extension on their street seven years prior. The Town Council had approved an ordinance to assist homeowners on Forest Road and Cedar Terrace with well water problems, but bills the had never been sent out.

"Someone dropped the ball and now I'm being asked to pay for it," Andriy said Monday.

This year, Town Attorney Jack Fracassini had advised the Town Council to place liens on the 15 properties and to bill the residents for the water main extension and lateral hook ups to "make the town whole."

Each property owner was to receive an $11,830 assessment, but Fracassini later factored in credits based upon a $40,331 refund the town received from Aquarion Water Co. for water meters and lateral hook ups. Each assessment was reduced by $1,094.91, bringing it down to $10,735.51 a piece.

However, Barbara T. Edgar of Forest Road had spoken with Steve Glowa of Aquarion earlier in the day on Monday. Glowa handled the project for the water company. Based on their conversation, Edgar came up with a different figure. Among the differences, she subtracted $7,000 for fire hydrants and came up with $7,580 assessments per household.

After listening to both sides, the Town Council voted 6-3 to approve the $10,735.51 assessments. Democrats Nick Kapoor, Dee Dee Martin and Raymond Knapp voted in opposition because they believed the Republican leadership cut off debate too soon.

"I think they completely disregarded everything we submitted," Edgar said after the meeting. "They should have called Mr. Glowa into a meeting to see what Aquarion really had to say before making a decision. It will probably result in some lawsuits."

One lawsuit is already pending. Three property owners had bought their home after the agreement had been made between the town and the previous owners, and one family is suing. The Town Council held an executive session to discuss it in private Monday night.

Fracassini said that he had also spoken with Glowa, adding that Glowa went through Aquarion's archives for four days upon his request.

John Badyrka of Forest Road said, "They should subtract the cost of the fire hydrants off the bill. It's as simple as that."

Any affected resident wishing to appeal their assessment in court has until April 29 to decide and would have to do it individually. Badyrka said it would cost about $500 just to file an appeal.

Five percent annual interest would be charged starting on May 1, according to the motion the council approved. However, Fracassini said that Finance Dir. Carl Tomchik is researching the interest rate and that he should have an answer on exactly what it should be in about a week.

Debate on the Floor

One point of contention was over whether the neighbors should have to pay for the fire hydrants. Kapoor had repeatedly asked if the hydrants were included in the assessments.

Town Council Vice Chairwoman Debra Heim said it is, adding the homeowners benefit from lower fire insurance because of the hydrants.

Councilman Frank Lieto pointed out that the town has been paying interest on the cost of the work for the past seven years. "If everything had been done smoothly, it would have been paid for by the residents," he said. "They're not being charged for that."

"Why should the residents be paying for what was a town mistake?" Kapoor asked, referring to the town's failure to bill the homeowners for seven years.

Lieto said, "Yes there was a mistake. We do not believe they should have to pay the interest, but it's important to mention that these residents have been benefiting from the water main [paid for] by the town over the past six years."

Town Council Chairwoman Enid Lipeles said it would take a two-thirds vote to call the question on the revised assessments and Councilman Tony Unger seconded the motion. Though Kapoor said he wanted to ask more questions, the council decided 6-3 along party lines to vote on the $10,735.51 assessments.

The motion for the assessments passed 6-3.

"We gave them back $1,094, which is fair because for seven years they've had clean water," Lipeles said.

Unger said council members considered all of the information on the issue before making a decision.

"Anybody who says anybody already made up their mind, I take exception to that," Unger said. "If the town isn't made whole, whatever the neighbors don't pay is picked up by the rest of the taxpayers."

Since the water main was installed, Unger said the town has picked up the maintenance costs.

 'It's a Republican Town'

After the meeting, council Democrats were still upset that there was not more debate before the vote on the assessments was taken.

"It is utterly ridiculous that the minority was not allowed to ask more questions before the motion was called," Kapoor said. "Robert's Rules are meant to protect the minority. What happened tonight was an affront to the neighbors of Forest Road and Cedar Terrace and the minority."

Martin said, "Since when can't we talk for five minutes to ask questions? The Republicans caucus before the meeting and draft a motion. We never even heard it until it was read aloud. We had about two or three questions, then they used the parliamentary procedure to call the question and end the debate. It's bad for the public too."

"I think the number's high," Martin added of the assessment. "I don't think the hydrants should be in there, but that's what the debate is for: Try to convince me that I'm wrong."

When asked about council Democrats' complaints, Lipeles said she always goes out of her way to give Kapoor more time than anyone else to ask questions because he is a new council member. She estimated that he was given 15 to 20 minutes to ask questions.

"He went over hydrants and hydrants and hyrdrants and there was nothing new," Lipeles said of her decision to call the question.

She added that State Rep. DebraLee Hovey (R-112) could tell people about how the Democratic Party majority at the state level goes over issues in a caucus then passes it over the Republican minority.

"We caucus and it runs more smoothly," Lipeles said. "That is the democratic way. We're the majority, so that's what the voters must want. This is a Republican town and they seem to be happy. It's the minority that brings up the politics every single time."

Christine E. April 12, 2012 at 03:18 PM
Walt... If you were running a business, and one day an error occurred within the bookkeeping that resulted in a significant loss of revenue and required that you pay thousands in legal fees, would you be so forgiving? Probably not. You'd probably investigate who caused the problem, why it happened, and how to avoid it in the future. You would also probably be more likely to pay extra close attention to what your bookkeeper is doing, if not replace them with someone new all together. What makes town employees any different? Are they not subject to the same standards simply because they work for the town?
Laura April 12, 2012 at 03:24 PM
monroe taxpayer April 12, 2012 at 05:12 PM
First It is shocking that this happened to begin with. But it then went unresolved and unnoticed for several years even after the original homeowners made inquires? There is no reason not to have a open investigation and explanation of this mess. The idea that it should t be brushed aside without investigation hints that there is much more to this story. Or at the very least it seems political affiliation is being used to protect employees. This attempt to handle this issue in this way shows that in Monroe, politics is more important then the what is right for the taxpayers / families. What does this method say about all decisions by our elected officials and the future of Monroe?
Steve Kirsch April 13, 2012 at 03:18 AM
Enough already with the “who did it” and “how did it happen” stuff! The reality is that we will never know for sure from what I have heard (meaning it may not be 100% true). The Town Council approved the resolution but may not have had any follow-up process. The motion may have included an amendment during debate telling the First Selectman at the time to do something so maybe he failed. Then there is the tax collector who can put liens on the property but has to be told to do so. Did the Council tell him? Did the First Selectman? What about the town attorney at the time who could have advised and maybe even directed the tax collector to apply the liens, or maybe just remind either the Council or First Selectman that it needed to be done. Was there someone in public works that was involved with the construction who could have notified others that the work was completed and thereby triggering a thought by others to bill the citizens? Was there a building inspection at the time the water lines were attached to the homes? How about the finance department that paid the bills and took the money from some account in order to do so? What about the Board of Finance who looks after all the spending in town and helps to determine where funding comes? Clearly it was a major screw-up with lots of opportunity to catch the error or omission and fix it. So where do we go from here? (End Part 1)
Steve Kirsch April 13, 2012 at 03:20 AM
Part 2 So where do we go from here? All of you raising this issue have to understand that Monroe Patch is not a formal vehicle for communicating with town officials and is certainly not the place where you are going to get any real response. Instead, you need to get out from in front of your computers and go to the next Town Council meeting. Stand up during public participation and ask the First Selectman and Town Council members what has been done to ensure that something like this never happens again. You could also contact the First Selectman and ask for a personal meeting to discuss your concerns about this whole matter. Maybe you should just write letters to the First Selectman and Town Council. If you are really concerned, stop using Patch and use the avenues available to you through our town government. Oh, by the way, I think that the Town Council has put in place a process to track items in the future. Add that to your questions you can ask during public participation. End Part 2


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »