.

Water Issues Sink Zoning Overlay Zone for Apartments

Concern over protection of Monroe's natural resources leads to unanimous denial of an application for a Neighborhood Apartment Residential Overlay Zone.

Planning & Zoning Commissioners agree on the need for a more diverse housing mix in town, but share concerns over the potential environmental impacts of a Neighborhood Apartment Residential Overlay Zone proposed by a local developer. The P&Z unanimously denied the proposal on Thursday night.

The NARO Zone would have allowed seven units per acre in developments built on a minimum of four acre lots in a cluster housing development. It would be within walking distance of shopping centers along major commercial arteries. The apartments would benefit young professionals, young couples and empty nesters, according to Kimball Group.

Kimball Group presented the application during the hearing on behalf of its subsidiary company, Elm Street Farm LLC, and its co-applicant BNM Builders & Developers.

"I feel that there is a need for multi-unit housing of some type in Monroe," said P&Z Vice Chairman William Porter. "This particular application has some points from our Plan of Conservation & Development."

But Porter said it did not offer the same protection of natural resources, wetlands and watersheds that the POCD calls for.

"In general, it's a good concept," Porter said. "But I think these regulations need a lot more work to comply more with our POCD."

An amendment to Article XVI and Sections 117-1600 and 117-1610 of town zoning regulations was needed to make the NARO Zone a reality, and the application was presented at a time when the P&Z Commission is revising Monroe's zoning regulations.

Commissioner Brian Quinn expressed his belief that the town would benefit from the types of projects that a NARO Zone could bring, but added he wanted to wait until the commission finishes revising Monroe's regulations before considering such an application on its own.

Commissioner Jim Weinberg expressed concern over what would happen if a NARO Zone were ever to be expanded upon, as well as his opinion that it represents spot zoning. Weinberg also said that much of the proposed amendment was "arbitrary". For instance, he questioned why the housing would have to be near neighborhood shopping or by a major road.

"I think there is a better approach. Maybe we can rewrite our regulations. Maybe we can have an overlay zone over the whole town," Weinberg said.

An overlay zone allows different uses in a district — without changing the zoning — for applications that meet requirements for a special exception permit.

"I’m leery of this route," Weinberg said. "I don't think there should be a hurry to get this done."

Chairman Patrick O'Hara said there is "great concern" that an overlay zone would limit the town's ability for economic development.

Wetlands, Septic, Condos

O'Hara said Monroe is supportive of alternative housing and recalled a POCD recommendation for a housing study to determine what kinds of housing the town needs.

"There still are a lot of questions unanswered," he said of the NARO Zone application.

O'Hara said he heard comments during the hearing that septic issues are often due to a lack of maintenance — usually with community systems at condo complexes.

"How do you maintain a septic system when there are 20 separate unit owners?" he asked.

Commission Secretary Karen Martin pointed out that often times housing that starts off as apartments, becomes condos down the road.

O'Hara said he has never seen so much resounding opposition to a proposal from referral letters as he has with this one. Among the opposition is the Greater Bridgeport Regional Planning Council, the Newtown town planner and Aquarion Water Co.

Though the Newtown Planning & Zoning Commission expressed its support for the NARO Zone, that town's planner later wrote that he doubted the commission would have supported it if its members had known about the potential impact on the water supply.

Aquarion urged Monroe's P&Z not to approve the application unless it is revised to protect the town's watershed and drinking water.

Working Together

After the commission's vote, John Kimball, principal of Kimball Group, said he felt bad about being turned down, but felt good that his application brought forward ideas that could improve the town's regulations.

"I think the commission seems to want to add some safeguards and work it into the regulations," Kimball said. "And we support the commission and will work together to have something that protects the town. It's a new concept."

Kevin Solli, an engineer with Kimball Group, said, "I think they believe it served a housing need in town, but have questions — and we'll help to answer those questions."

Gerald M. Gaynor October 05, 2012 at 01:06 PM
NIMBY is alive and well in Monroe. Perhaps the real issue is the need for the installation of sanitary sewers so that the Town can have some real economic development.
christine October 05, 2012 at 01:49 PM
That's fantastic news, I'm so glad to hear it was denied.
FrmrMonroeChris October 05, 2012 at 10:22 PM
This is why the town is not open to young professionals. I grew up in town and would love to move back, but would prefer to live in a townhouse. This town will never grow and continues to excel at detracting residents and businesses.
Twisted Pumpkin October 06, 2012 at 01:48 AM
Score another one for the gang that wants no business in town!
Barney October 06, 2012 at 02:54 AM
It not be natural to be overlaying zones. That be prime land for frog leg eating. Monroe not be needing more families be moving in. We already be having too many interlopers. This be a farming community and this here Planning and zoning fellas be getting that. We be needing the right to farm. This here planning and Zoning be understanding that business not be welcome. They be getting it that we not be needing more families be moving in. My connection on the planning and zoning be telling me that he be making sure monroe be a farming community. We need to be spending our money fighting these fancy developers who be wanting to ruin our farm land. I not be caring that this planning and zoning be spending $800,000 fighting business. I not be caring that there be 21 lawsuits against the town, We need to protect our farm land at all costs no matter how much it costs.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something