.
Feedback

School Lunch Survey Spurs Decision to Put Program Out to Bid

Sodexo, which runs the lunch program, blames problems on USDA restrictions that have recently been lifted.

A survey on school lunches found that many students find food portions for menu items like popcorn chicken are too small. Others believe the food is too processed and unhealthy with options like mac and cheese, hot dogs and "Italian Dippers". And some parents say their children have told them their cafeteria has ran out of food.

Then again, slightly more than half of parents surveyed by Monroe Public Schools report their children are happy with the lunch program in their school.

When asked if they were satisfied with the overall service by Sodexo, the company contracted to run the lunch program, 51% answered "Yes" and 49% checked "No".

Board of Education member Mark Antinozzi pointed out that many questions in the survey are that close when it comes to satisfaction.

"Much are 50% satisfaction. It could go either way," he said at the board's meeting on Dec. 17. "That's not the way it should be. There should be more of a balance for approval than disapproval."

Board Chairman Darrell Trump said, "I've been in business a long time and a company's satisfaction had to be 80% or above to be a good provider."

Lee Crouch, a board member, noted how some parents who are happy with the level of service may not have responded to the survey and fellow board member, Kelly Plunkett, said less than 10% of parents in the district participated in it.

"There were a lot that didn't participate because they were unhappy with the food," said Vice Chairwoman Donna Lane. "A lot of parents I spoke to said they never received the survey."

Though Sodexo's contract does not expire until June of 2014, the Board of Education decided to put the lunch program out to bid by sending out a request for proposals in a 6-3 vote.

During the discussion of the survey results, Supt. of Schools James Agostine said Sodexo was responsive to complaints and that he met with its executives, who blamed USDA guidelines on the maximum amount of meats and grains for 2012-13 for much of the problems. Agostine said the guidelines led to boycotts of school lunches around the country.

The USDA recently lifted the restrictions.

"They're ecstatic the restrictions were lifted, because they think that's the reason behind it,' Agostine said of Sodexo.

Aside from running the school lunch program in town, Agostine said, "Sodexo has been a true friend."

Sodexo donated food for the Monroe Rotary Club's golf tournament, supplied free food to the Monroe Senior Center when it was being used as an emergency shelter during Hurricane Sandy, and assisted Newtown Public Schools in getting Sandy Hook Elementary School's cafeteria set up at Chalk Hill, according to Agostine.

Digesting Survey Results

Plunkett noted how responses to survey questions could be misleading. For instance, she said a child sometimes likes the main dish but not the sides.

"It's a hard survey for parents to do when they didn't eat it," she said of the food, adding she doubts the results could be trusted even if children took the survey.

"I'm adamant about not voting tonight," Plunkett said. "I think going to an RFP is too reactionary. The RFP could come back higher. We haven't sat down with the vendor to talk about the issues and come up with a working plan."

Board Secretary Mark Hughes said, "I don't think we're doing the district any disservice anytime we go out for an RFP."

Some parents have complained that school cafeterias have actually ran out of food before, according to Board of Education member Donna Lane. "One child going without food because they ran out is too high for me," she said.

Lane also pointed out that 63% of parents surveyed expressed a willingness to pay more for higher quantities and quality of food.

Antinozzi said the survey results could help Sodexo to improve.

"If you're not aware of something, how can you correct it?" he asked. "They're a big corporation. They know what they're doing. Let them correct it."

Trump countered that if Sodexo didn't know there were issues, then that's an issue.

Crouch suggested having a small group of Board of Education members meet with Sodexo executives to question them and, if they don't like the answers, then go to an RFP. Board member George King agreed.

No Food in the Cafeteria?

Board of Education member Jeff Guttman expressed doubts that school cafeterias have run out of food, saying children may tell their parents they ran out of something they wanted without mentioning that other food options were available.

"We all have kids," he said. "They stretch the truth a little bit."

Plunkett said, "It's incredulous to me to run out of food in a pantry. I want a 30-day action plan and if they don't improve, we can go to an RFP."

"I thought the same thing," Lane said. "How can a cafeteria run out of food on the second day of school? A cafeteria worker told my daughter, 'We ran out of food. Sit down.' And I know she wasn't the only student. One employee who left gave me a list of things. She said they cut their hours. She asked for more so she could clean the cafeteria. It's disgusting."

Prior to the vote, Antinozzi said, "I ask that Mrs. Lane recuse herself for a conflict of interest. I don't see running out of food in this district."

Guttman disagreed, saying, "Every decision we make here involves the children. None of us would be able to vote. We all learn from others' experiences."

Trump said, "In this case Mr. Antinozzi, I don't think recusal is required."

The board decided to go out to an RFP by a vote of 6 to 3, with Trump, Hughes, Lane, King, Guttman and Dr. Alan Vaglivelo in favor and Crouch, Plunkett and Antinozzi against.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Monroe Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:23 pm
If you have any trouble, email support@patch.com. The help desk will do it for you if need be. ButRead More changing your settings should work.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Hi Steve, To stop getting emails for every comment under a story, when you're signed on, click underRead More "Hi Steve" at the top of the page, and choose Email Settings from the dropdown menu. There's an option titled "Comments", uncheck the box that is automatically checked so you will no longer receive comment updates by email.
Steve Kirsch May 15, 2013 at 11:56 am
I found that I could turn them off in my profile under e-mail settings. However, it appears thatRead More this is now an all or nothing rather than by selected posts or individual articles.
Bill Bittar (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:32 am
Hi Steve, The comment stream doesn't appear on the homepage in the new design. Some of the sitesRead More that went 2.0 before mine did heard complaints about that. I don't know if it will be changed or not. Right now Patch is gathering all feedback.
Crown Royal May 3, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Perhaps a unique ID sent out yearly with you tax bill or something like that? Or I think what mightRead More be better is rather than crossing off names manually on a sheet of paper when you go to vote, they should use a computer system. This would allow you to travel to the closest polling place (Not across town as is the case with me.)
Christine E. May 3, 2013 at 03:36 am
They don't ask you for ID to fill out an absentee! No difference, IMO.
QWERTY May 3, 2013 at 12:57 am
That's why I stated, "two MAIN groups of VOTERS": 1. Parent's who always vote YES - theyRead More want as much $$$ for education as possible. 2. People who always vote NO, regardless of budget - they don't want to pay more in taxes. These groups have an obvious reason to vote. After that, it starts to get fragmented. I really haven't seen much literature from the "Parents who don't want more taxes" group.
LittleTalks April 23, 2013 at 09:10 pm
@John, never said we should freeze spending till everyone can afford it, no need to be a dramaRead More queen. And it is none of your business what I have done for others. But what I have not done, is belittle those that can't afford a tax increase and pretend I am better than them.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:23 pm
No one's expecting anything different! Monroe benefits from wealthier resident, not poorer ones!Read More That's the hard and rash truth. I'm not saying it's right or honest! It's to the town's benefit to price people out of their homes as disgusting as that may sound.
QWERTY April 23, 2013 at 07:18 pm
Being unemployed is also finite, that's why it's a good idea to create a 12 month householdRead More emergency fund. No one forces someone to purchase a home without this emergency fund.
Alex April 21, 2013 at 11:00 pm
I'll vote yes when its at a 3.5% mill rate increase. That's a decent tax increase in this economy.Read More It's tough working $20-$40 increases per month into your personal budget each year on top of everything else that increases in price.
Fed Up April 21, 2013 at 09:11 pm
No more tax increases. Read our lips.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:47 pm
The budget is a fair one, and the quality of our schools and town services depend upon it. There isRead More never a good time for a mill rate increase, but it is well worth the investment in our home values, community, and kid's education. Please vote Yes on Tuesday.
Crown Royal April 26, 2013 at 07:34 pm
David, This is already approved.
David Wilgan April 26, 2013 at 07:29 pm
My understanding is the contract for 10 years. First, I don't trust any corporation, period; letRead More alone for 10 years. What if Honeywell goes bankrupt? is this project bonded by Honeywell to insure completion? And to those how say Honeywell will never go under, need I mention Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Sterns and the plethora of banks, investment companies and auto manufacturers that required bailouts to remain afloat. Moreover, what is the savings based upon? Again, my understanding is the savings are based on the current natural gas price versus oil; and Honeywell will guarantee to offset any shortfall in savings if the price increases. Is there an aggregate maximum of shortfall payout, or is Honeywell's exposure unlimited? Also, if this is such a great deal, why is the town being charged 1.45% interest on a municipal lease? Why not zero percent; let's negotiate harder. Furthermore, why is the town borrowing the $ from CLP @ 0% interest? CLP should make the total $400,000 a direct grant for their inferior service and overpriced utility rates. I'm tired of subsidizing large dividends and massive executive payouts to screw ups. The contract can be written for 10 years, provided Honeywell bonds the project, the contract is conditionally renewable by the town each year based upon the realized savings and subject to renegotiation; CLP grants the $ up front and 0% is charged on the lease. Tell Honeywell to stick the door locks, I prefer bonding the project.
michael massao April 20, 2013 at 02:40 pm
The Honeywell contract is the absolute right thing to do. It is critical to get out on Tuesday andRead More vote yes.